During research for the Numismatica font, I became concerned about the limited understanding some numismatists have of the Greek letter Stigma. This note explains the letterform and why there may be confusion; in this article, I use capitalization to differentiate case of Greek letterforms, e.g., Sigma and sigma.
![]() |
1 |
|
![]() |
10 |
|
![]() |
100 |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
20 |
![]() |
200 | ||
![]() |
3 |
![]() |
30 |
![]() |
300 | ||
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
40 |
![]() |
400 | ||
![]() |
5 |
![]() |
50 |
![]() |
500 | ||
![]() |
6 |
![]() |
60 | ||||
![]() |
7 |
![]() |
70 | ||||
![]() |
8 |
![]() |
80 | ||||
![]() |
9 |
![]() |
90 |
My concern is due to an assertion by Kevin Butcher in Roman Provincial Coins
that the numeral six in Greek dates was the character sigma1, which
he shows as ς , the lowercase final form
used only at the end of a word in modern Greek. I discussed my opinion with several scholars and consulted
authoritative texts. I believe Butcher is in error because he
confused a lowercase final sigma with Stigma
.
While the shapes of those two letterforms are very similar, lowercase Greek letters were
not developed until the Middle Ages. Thus, one cannot use the relatively
modern letterform to argue that Sigma was used as the number six in archaic,
classical or Hellenistic coin legends. Also arguing against Butcher's
assertion would be the negative consequence of using Sigma to simultaneously
represent 6 and 200.
Perhaps one source of confusion might be that while digamma occasionally
appeared on coins as , identical
to the common square Sigma2, the engraver's intent to represent
digamma or Sigma should always be clear from the context. Adding to the confusion among numismatists
was the use of a
capital Latin
to represent
by
several recent authors3, lending false credence to the idea that Sigma
represents numeral six. While the
letterform was used as
Iota, Beta and Sigma, I find no evidence it was employed as Stigma or Digamma on
archaic, classical or Hellenistic Greek coins, but
was used to indicate officina six
on Roman coins.
G. F. Hill differentiates Digamma
and
Stigma
,
and tells us the
was
used only as a numeral4; it always represented the number six and its name
evidently coincides with its early origin in a Sigma-Tau ligature5. The terminology
confusion between Digamma
and
Stigma
appears
to be caused by their common numeric value and that
supplanted
.
We know Digamma
had its origin as a borrowed Semitic letter6 for use as a numeral but it
also was used to represent the sound "vau" or "w". Digamma
was
used as both letter and number until its eventual disappearance.7 I have
not seen Digamma
used on coins in its numeric sense (and would be
happy to learn of such use in any coin legend).
The name Stigma for
may have as its origin the vocalization of the Sigma-Tau ligature
ΣΤ,
whose appearance is similar. This
is consistent with present-day Greek usage; while modern Greeks normally
employ Arabic numbers, they also use the old Greek non-zero system, and
readily recognize
(which
they call Stigma) as the numeral six. For example, the old Greek letters are used to number pages
rather like Roman numerals are used in English8, and to number laws
in
legislative documents. The font specification community, which
includes and relies heavily on Greek academic specialists, uses the name Stigma for
in the Unicode specification.9
On some Greek coins, Stigma takes the stylistic form seen on the following
coins, very similar to the
used on Vardanes II Tetradrachms Dated 366.
![]() ![]() - G. Macdonald, Catalogue of Greek Coins in the Hunterian Collection (University of Glasgow, 1905), p. 194, no. 30; plate LXXIII, 24 |
or several silver Imperial coins from Antioch with the head of Augustus:
![]() ![]() - Barry Rightman collection with permission of the Ancient Club of Los Angeles |
![]() ![]() - BMC Galatia, Cappadocia, and Syria (1899), p. 166, no. 131; plate XX, 10 |
![]() ![]() - BMC Galatia, Cappadocia, and Syria (1899), p. 168, no. 147; plate XX, 13 |
Chris Hopkins
23 April 2001 (amended 26 May 2006)
____________________
Notes:
1. Kevin Butcher,
Roman Provincial Coins:
An Introduction to the Greek Imperials
(1988), p. 114.
2. G.F. Hill. Ancient Greek and Roman Coins (Argonaut, 1964
reprint), p. 215. Hill's summary of Greek letterforms has been invaluable in
preparation of the Numismatica font. Without naming them, he discusses
Digamma
and Stigma
as two different characters.
3. For examples where is given instead of
the correct
, see
D.R.
Sear, Greek Coins and their Values, Vol. II (1979), p. xxxvii and Greek
Imperial Coins and their Values (1982), p. xxv; J.M. Jones, A
Dictionary of Ancient Greek Coins (1986), p. 158; Wayne Sayles, Ancient
Coin Collecting, vol. I, p. 98 and vol. II, p. 13.
4. Hill, op. cit. While Hill's statement is true for ancient usage,
there are more modern texts (1400s through 1700s) where a lowercase stigma was
used in place of the lowercase sigma-tau ligature in words such as
Constantinople, Κονςαντινοπολη not
Κονσταντινοπολη (Michael
Everson, "Additional Greek characters for the UCS," Working Group
Document ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N1743, 25 May 1998, p. 1.)
5. Greg Flegg (ed.). Numbers through the Ages (1989), p. 88. Chicken
or egg: none of the authors discusses whether the
ΣΤ ligature
appeared and acquired the name Stigma, or the ligature was used because of the
letterform's already established name.
6. Karl Menninger. Number Words and Number Symbols (1970), p. 270.
Qoppa = 90 and Sampi = 900 were also borrowed Semitic letters.
7. Herbert Weir Smyth, Greek Grammar (1956), p. 8. Digamma
presumably fell into disuse about the time Athens adopted the Ionic alphabet
in 403 B.C., but it disappeared gradually, and was used in Boeotia
as late as 200 B.C.
8. Georges Ifrah. The Universal History of Numbers from Prehistory to the
Invention of the Computer (2000), p. 220.
9. Unicode Consortium. "Greek and Coptic, Range
0370-02FF," The
Unicode Standard, Version 3.0 (Addison-Wesley Developers
Press, 2000).
This page last updated 01 Mar 2023